From Talk Sikkim: Interview with Dr. Harka Bahadur Chettri
This interview of Dr. HB Chettri by Prabin Moktan was published in the May 2011 issue of “Talk Sikkim”. Below are some excerpts. The entire interview (.pdf) can be found at this link
Media secretary, spokesman and most likely the new GJMM MLA from Kalimpong, Dr. Harka Bahadur Chettri is the intellectual face of the GL2 movement. Prabin Moktan, fellow alumnus of FLATFILE, the literary journal from Kalimpong, met up with Dr. Chettri and spoke to him on a variety of issues
Media secretary, spokesman and most likely the new GJMM MLA from Kalimpong, Dr. Harka Bahadur Chettri is the intellectual face of the GL2 movement. Prabin Moktan, fellow alumnus of FLATFILE, the literary journal from Kalimpong, met up with Dr. Chettri and spoke to him on a variety of issues:
Keeping political rhetoric aside, do you think there is any merit or honesty in Ghising’s pronouncements that GL is not possible given the current reality of the Indian body politic and that the hills are better off with the sixth schedule status, which at least has a constitutional guarantee? How is the alternative that your party envisages more viable, better?
Well so far Ghising is concerned I should not be so rude on him, but judging by his track record he is better explained or better described as a political joker and nothing above that. The Sixth Schedule chapter was closed immediately after the 13th Lok Sabha was dissolved. In the third tripartite GK Pillai the present home secretary categorically said that the issue of the Sixth Schedule is shelved. That was the statement of the
Government of India, he had the mandate of the GOI. Now Sixth Schedule is meant for a specific region for a specific category of people. It has never traveled this side of the Brahmaputra. In our case it was like giving unequal treatment to equal kind of people. There are other anomalies there. I am not going into those details. But so far as the question of constitutional guarantee is concerned, it is just to mislead the layman. Even the interim which was a temporary setup had legislative power and until and unless you have constitutional guarantee where do you derive your legislative power from? So compared to the 45 departments in the 6th schedule, the interim had 84 departments with power to create jobs , with power to appoint, which was not there in the 6th schedule. And the most dangerous thing in the Sixth Schedule was the leader would have been chosen either by succession or by nomination. There was no question of you know, democratically electing the leader. So how can a civilized society accept that kind of formulation where your democratic right goes for a six?Do you think the demand for GL has a sell-by date? Or will it forever remain an emotional issue that political parties will cash in? Between identity and livelihood which do you think will the people ultimately choose, especially in case of prolonged attrition?
I agree with you. And what is identity after all? How does this question arise…you know…why people support the cause of identity? There are a number of factors which contribute towards creating an identity. What Morcha is trying to do is, during the 11th round of talks we tried to include everything that a State controls in the interim. We tried to snap every tie that this region had with the State. The only contact was the governor. Otherwise the financial freedom, the administrative powers, the legislative power, everything, lock stock and barrel we managed to get. And remember that this was only the interim…our aim was. ..that when we settle for the final thing it should be one step above what was agreed in the interim. Also the home minister, minister of state for home, our MP himself, they were unanimous in the idea that the Union Government must contemplate on a Union Territory status for the hills. So to begin with this interim thing was not a bad thing after all. The Morcha’s effort was to create a boundary separate from Bengal and in a sense a boundary creates identity. Regarding this boundary, we have made the GOI agree to send a joint verification team to verify Gorkha majority areas in the Terai and Doars. There is a precedent for that – 95 Bodo majority villages in Assam have been included in the Bodo Territorial Council. Even Mamta Banerjee recently in an interview talked about Greater Darjeeling to include Doars and Terai. The sixth schedule that Ghising is harping on would have put a seal on the boundary issue and Siliguri and Doars would have been excluded. We are forcing a rethink on the territory and that I think is a victory of the Morcha.

