The Telegraph published a most distasteful and ill-informed article by Sumanta Sen on April 3, 2008. The article was so disparaging, divisive and just so widely off the mark that I totally ignored it, as one would ignore the rantings of a juvenile blogger online.. Anyone with a keyboard and an opinion can write anything, and responding to all of them is not possible, nor required. That is the reason this site did not feature the contents of that article.
However, the difference here is that even though the quality of the article makes it undeserving of anyone’s attention it is unfortunate that The Telegraph deemed it appropriate to publish the article. By virtue of this blunder wherein Sen’s article slipped through the editorial cracks, the article has been given the credibility that comes with publication in a national newspaper.
The Telegraph should acknowledge their mistake, should retract the article, and offer an apology to the citizens of the Darjeeling district who have been maligned by the careless writings of Mr. Sen.
It has since then come to our attention that Dr. Sonam Wangyal had written to The Telegraph with an appropriate reply. However, the Telegraph has not yet responded to Dr. Wangyal’s correspondence. Hopefully they will do the correct thing and print Dr. Wangyal’s rejoinder in an equally prominent location in their publication. In the meanwhile however, I have received permission from Dr. Wangyal to re-post his letter in this site.
Thanks,
-Admin
————————
Give Us One More Thing
Writing rejoinders is not my cup of tea but Sumanta Sen’s Fight for a New Home (Fifth Column, 3 April 2008) leaves me no other option than this unpleasant task of responding to his essay that openly betrays lack of access to ground realities and of his little knowledge of the history of Darjeeling’s hills and plains.
Firstly, let us take the case of his profoundly disturbing declaration that “Strictly speaking, the Nepalese in Darjeeling can be dubbed ‘foreigners’ because they have come from another country.” Banking on Sen’s logic the Parsis scattered all over India, people of Ahom descent in Assam, the Aryans who came to India from Europe, the Sindhis since Sindh is primarily in Pakistan and as a matter of sad but ’strictly speaking’ contention all the Bengalis that migrated to West Bengal from East Pakistan are also foreigners. It is foolhardy to throw stones at others unless one lives in a bullet-proof glass house. And Sen does not have that protection for all we have to do is take a peek at Tripura, the very name suggests the place belongs to the Tripuris, where hordes of refugees poured in from East Pakistan and settled in the fringes of the small kingdom. Today the original inhabitants are in the fringes, very akin to refugees anywhere, and, to use Sen’s term, ‘immigration’ has seen to it that the centre of political, financial, cultural, linguistic and administrative fields are with the Bengalis: from the Chief Minister down to almost every officer that matters is a Bengali. Business is conducted in Bengali, the colleges and schools are predominantly Bengali and even the restaurants smell Bengali or should I say they smell of elish, rhui and bhetki. One could ask the same question Sen has asked in the essay, “Should numbers alone be the deciding factor when it comes to determining the future of the hills (read natives of Tripura)?” Has Sen ever wondered what ever happened to the Reangs, Chakmas, Malsums (Halam), Mogs, Darlongs and the other tribes besides the ruling Tripuris. Nevertheless, these are realities that one must learn to accept and by extension learn to accept that Gorkhas in Darjeeling are as much Indians as Parsis in Mumbai or Bengalis in Tripura.
There was a suggestion that the Indo/Darjeeling-Nepal border could be fenced to check “such a high rate of influx“. Permit me to mention that the Indo-Nepal Treaty of 1950, Article VII, states, “The Government of India and Nepal agree to grant, on reciprocal basis, to the nationals of one country in the territories of the other the same privileges in the matter of residence, ownership of property, participation in trade and commerce, movement and privileges of a similar nature.” If any type of barricading is to be resorted to then the treaty or the specific Article has to be revoked. Who stands to gain or lose by annulling the Article makes an interesting work but is beyond the scope of the present subject. What I find most amusing is that the Government of West Bengal has, even today, a department for Refugee Relief and Rehabilitation headed by the Hon’ble Minister of State, Shri Binay Krishna Biswas (Secretary: Smt. R. Venkataraman, IAS, and Officer on Special Duty: Shri A. Kanugo, WBCS). The Department was formed in 1950 with the following objective: “The Refugee Relief and Rehabilitation Department was created to handle the enormous dimensions of the human tragedy that West Bengal had to face following the partition of India in 1947…” It has been over six decades since partition and the Department has been around for almost as long and its existence clearly suggests that the infiltration still continues and the illegal immigrants even have a department to welcome them. On the other hand if there is no illegal immigration why do we have the Department sixty years to the unfortunate events.
Mention has been made that the hills suffers from cultural hegemony, Gorkhas and Nepalis are different, and that the Sixth Schedule is best for the hills. In the first case the article mentions that “display of muscle power has also ensured that they (Gorkhas) ride roughshod over a Buddhist culture, which advocates peace, friendship and harmony.“. The British may have been past masters in the art of divide and rule but Sen’s divisionary line will only raise a lot of dust and disgust. I am a Buddhist, a member of a minority community, but in my almost sixty years of existence not once have I been intimidated or my faith questioned, let alone my Buddhist culture being ridden “roughshod”. It is because of the tolerance that exists in the hills that Buddhist Bhutia women volunteered to fast till death for Gorkhaland, it is because of the same reason that Pemba Tshering Bhutia has been elected the chief of the Municipality, it is the very same reason that makes Kambachen (a Bhutia) and Cheten Sherpa (also a Bhutia) raise their fists and voices for Gorkhaland. Bhutias and Gorkhas may be culturally different but when it comes to Gorkhaland they speak the same language and run the same mile. Sen has even made an attempt to bring about a collision between the Gorkhas by writing that, “The Gorkhas, however, are a small community in Nepal.”. The scheme is to suggest that the others are not Gorkhas. I think it is best left to us to decide who is or is not a Gorkha: the semantics of the terms Gorkha and Nepali might confuse Sen and it is better that he makes peace with what little he knows. Where the Sixth Schedule is concerned I have never known a giver/donor being so utterly excited and frenzied to give the Sixth Schedule and conversely I have never seen the proposed receivers so absolutely hostile to the proposal. Need anything more be said on the matter!
There was one piece where Sen hit the nail on the head: Darjeeling belonged to Sikkim and it was gifted to the British by the Maharajah of Sikkim. In other words Darjeeling never belonged to Bengal. Now keeping that in mind the question that automatically arises is, “How does West Bengal fit into the slot?” Maybe there is a shared culture (No), could there be a shared history (No), possibly the physiognomy of the people of Bengal and Darjeeling are similar (No), since they share a common boundary the terrain could be similar (No), or since the languages spoken by the two communities are derivative of Sanskrit…(don’t even think about it), script (No), food habits (No), dress (No), music, religion, mental temperament (No, No, No, and NO a lot many more things)! Bengal has to let go, if not today definitely sometime later.
Mr. Sen and his ilk must realize the hillmen are not Bengal’s or Bengalis’ enemies. Talk to any intellectuals like Krishna Singh Moktan, Dr. Indra Bahadur Rai, Dr. Harkabahadur Chhetri, Prof. Samten Norbu, to name a few, and not only do they love the Bengalis but they hold anything Bengali in awe and reverence. I myself was taught by Bengalis, my colleagues are Bengalis, my workers are Bengalis and some of my most trusted friends are Bengalis. On 23 March 2008 Raja Surajit Sen, former Manager of Debpara Tea Estate passed away and six of us, all hillmen, closed shop and took the long ride to Shillong to pay our respect to a Bengali gentleman who was also our good friend. In front of hundreds of mourners all six of us cried like children because we loved that Bong and there are many others for whom we will do the same. Most hillmen simply love Bengalis for they have given us so much in terms of education, vocational guidance, thriftiness, the value of tourism, politics, pride in one’s culture, exposure to a wider world and much much more, and it will be difficult to find one adult Gorkha who has not been touched by a Bengali. Despite what you have written it does not dilute our love for the Bengalis but Mr. Sumanta Sen, please give us one more thing, give us Gorkhaland and you will forever touch our hearts.
Sonam B. Wangyal